In the world of business, companies often aim to keep customers coming back. One powerful way to do this is by implementing switching costs (also know as lock-ins). But what exactly are switching costs, and why are they so important? In this article, we’ll delve into the concept of switching costs and provide several great switching cost examples (including a Spotify- and Apple switching costs example).

What are switching costs?

Switching costs are the costs that customers face when they decide to change from one product or service to another. These costs can be financial, but they can also be non-monetary, like the time and effort required to switch. Switching costs help companies create a lock-in strategy, where customers become dependent on their product or service and find it difficult or inconvenient to move to a competitor.

While we often think of switching costs as just the money spent, they can include much more:

• Time spent learning how to use a new product or service.
• The inconvenience of losing a trusted customer service representative.
• The risk of losing rewards or benefits earned with the current provider.
• The effort involved in transferring data or integrating with other systems.

These factors can make customers think twice before leaving a company, even if they’re tempted by a competitor’s offer.

Why do companies use lock-ins?

A Lock-in strategy help businesses keep customers by making it difficult or costly for them to switch to a competitor. Even if a better deal is available, high switching costs often prevent customers from leaving. This strategy provides several key benefits:

• Increased profitability: When paired with a pricing model like the “razor-and-blade” model, companies can maximize profits by selling low-cost products upfront and higher-margin consumables later on.
• Customer retention: Lock-ins keep customers loyal for longer, reducing the chances of them switching to competitors.
• Repeat purchases: Customers continue buying from the same company, leading to consistent sales.
• Cost efficiency: Retaining existing customers is cheaper than acquiring new ones.

Potential disadvantages of switching costs

High switching costs can backfire on businesses. While they aim to retain customers, they can also:

• Frustrate customers: Feeling trapped can lead to dissatisfaction and negative feedback.
• Deter potential customers: Prospects might avoid a provider if they fear high switching costs.
• Harm brand reputation: Relying on barriers rather than quality can damage a company’s image.
• Limit feedback: Locked-in customers may not provide useful insights for improvement.

A lock-in strategy must be carefully considered and designed to reap the maximum benefits.

Which types of switching costs are there?

There are several types of switching costs, each creating barriers that keep customers from switching:

1. Financial costs: Direct costs like cancellation fees or the price of new equipment.
2. Time and effort: The time required to learn a new system or find a new provider.
3. Emotional costs: The discomfort of losing a trusted relationship with a company.
4. Risk: The fear of losing data or facing worse service with a new provider.

Discover our handpicked switching costs examples

Now, let’s dive into some specific examples to see how companies use these different types of switching costs to create lock-ins.

Switching costs example 1: Printer cartridges

Type of switching cost: Financial and technological

The first switching costs example concerns printer cartridges. In the printer industry, manufacturers often design their printers to only work with their brand’s ink cartridges. This is a clear example of technological lock-in. After purchasing the printer, customers are tied to buying the same brand of cartridges, which are typically expensive. Switching to another brand would mean buying a new printer or using non-compatible cartridges, which can be risky or costly.

By creating a technological dependency, the manufacturer ensures customers keep purchasing their consumables, making it difficult and expensive to switch to a different brand.

Switching costs example 2: B2B-software

Type of switching cost: Contractual and time-related

The second switching costs example is about B2B software. Many B2B-software companies use long-term contracts as a form of contractual lock-in. Once a business signs a contract with a software provider, switching to another company can involve steep penalties or cancellation fees. But beyond the financial costs, businesses must also invest time and effort into transferring data, retraining staff, and integrating the new software into their systems.

This makes switching extremely costly in terms of time and disruption, which locks customers into the original contract for the long haul.

Switching costs example 3: Music- & video streaming services

Type of switching cost: Emotional and incentive-based

The third switching costs example concerns streaming services. Streaming services like Spotify and Netflix use incentive-based lock-in to retain customers. For example, Spotify offers discounts to long-term subscribers, family plan users, and students. If a customer switches to another service, they might lose these benefits, making the transition financially less appealing.

Additionally, users invest time in creating playlists and setting preferences, making it emotionally difficult to switch. These personal investments, along with the loss of special deals, create emotional and incentive-based switching costs that keep users loyal

Switching costs example 4: Energy contracts

Type of switching cost: Financial and contractual

The fourth switching costs example concerns energy contracts. Energy providers frequently use long-term contracts that act as contractual lock-ins. These contracts often include early cancellation fees that make it expensive for customers to switch providers before the contract ends. Even if a customer finds a better rate elsewhere, they may face hefty fines for breaking their current contract.

In addition to the financial penalties, the process of finding a new provider and setting up a new account can be time-consuming, adding another layer of inconvenience to switching

Switching costs example 5: Apple devices

Type of switching cost: Technological and ecosystem-based

The last switching costs example concerns Apple. Apple is a prime example of ecosystem lock-in. Once customers invest in multiple Apple products—such as an iPhone, MacBook, and Apple Watch—they become deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem. These devices are designed to work seamlessly together, allowing users to sync data, messages, and applications effortlessly.

Switching to a different brand would disrupt this ecosystem, leading to loss of convenience, data, and device compatibility. For example, moving from an iPhone to an Android device may result in losing access to iMessage, AirDrop, and other Apple-exclusive features. This creates a strong technological and ecosystem-based lock-in, making it challenging and inconvenient for users to switch to other brands.

By designing an interconnected system of products, Apple ensures that once customers buy into their ecosystem, the switching costs are high enough to keep them loyal.

Are you ready for more innovation inspiration?

I hope this articles about switching costs inspired you. Do you want to learn more about other great strategies like switching costs? Read the book Business Model Hacking.

You’re lucky! Limited-offer: Subscribe to Business Model Hacking and get the digital version of the book and the cards for free.